Messages in this thread | | | From | Vitaly Kuznetsov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: use shost_for_each_device() instead of open coding | Date | Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:53:00 +0200 |
| |
Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: KY Srinivasan >> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 11:35 AM >> To: Vitaly Kuznetsov; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: Long Li; Haiyang Zhang; James E.J. Bottomley; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: use shost_for_each_device() instead of open >> coding >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com] >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 2:31 AM >> > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org >> > Cc: Long Li; KY Srinivasan; Haiyang Zhang; James E.J. Bottomley; >> > devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: use shost_for_each_device() instead of >> > open coding >> > >> > Comment in struct Scsi_Host says that drivers are not supposed to >> > access __devices directly. storvsc_host_scan() doesn't happen in irq >> > context so we can just use shost_for_each_device(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> > Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Sorry for the ping but it seems the fix never made it to scsi tree...
>> > --- >> > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 9 +-------- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c >> > index 3c6584f..9ea912b 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c >> > @@ -426,7 +426,6 @@ static void storvsc_host_scan(struct work_struct >> > *work) >> > struct storvsc_scan_work *wrk; >> > struct Scsi_Host *host; >> > struct scsi_device *sdev; >> > - unsigned long flags; >> > >> > wrk = container_of(work, struct storvsc_scan_work, work); >> > host = wrk->host; >> > @@ -443,14 +442,8 @@ static void storvsc_host_scan(struct work_struct >> > *work) >> > * may have been removed this way. >> > */ >> > mutex_lock(&host->scan_mutex); >> > - spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags); >> > - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &host->__devices, siblings) { >> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags); >> > + shost_for_each_device(sdev, host) >> > scsi_test_unit_ready(sdev, 1, 1, NULL); >> > - spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags); >> > - continue; >> > - } >> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags); >> > mutex_unlock(&host->scan_mutex); >> > /* >> > * Now scan the host to discover LUNs that may have been added. >> > -- >> > 2.4.3
-- Vitaly
| |