Messages in this thread | | | From | KY Srinivasan <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: use shost_for_each_device() instead of open coding | Date | Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:34:41 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 2:31 AM > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Long Li; KY Srinivasan; Haiyang Zhang; James E.J. Bottomley; > devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: use shost_for_each_device() instead of open > coding > > Comment in struct Scsi_Host says that drivers are not supposed to access > __devices directly. storvsc_host_scan() doesn't happen in irq context > so we can just use shost_for_each_device(). > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > index 3c6584f..9ea912b 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c > @@ -426,7 +426,6 @@ static void storvsc_host_scan(struct work_struct > *work) > struct storvsc_scan_work *wrk; > struct Scsi_Host *host; > struct scsi_device *sdev; > - unsigned long flags; > > wrk = container_of(work, struct storvsc_scan_work, work); > host = wrk->host; > @@ -443,14 +442,8 @@ static void storvsc_host_scan(struct work_struct > *work) > * may have been removed this way. > */ > mutex_lock(&host->scan_mutex); > - spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags); > - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &host->__devices, siblings) { > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags); > + shost_for_each_device(sdev, host) > scsi_test_unit_ready(sdev, 1, 1, NULL); > - spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags); > - continue; > - } > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags); > mutex_unlock(&host->scan_mutex); > /* > * Now scan the host to discover LUNs that may have been added. > -- > 2.4.3
| |