[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[PATCH 0/3] hrtimer: HRTIMER_STATE_ fixes
On 06/08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I tend to agree, but I think its a pre-existing problem, not one
> > introduced by my proposed patch.
> Something like this would fix that I think. It fully preserves
> timer->state over hrtimer_start_range_ns().

Yes, but I think we can do a bit better.

Only for initial review, I need to re-check this...

And. I think that after you remove STATE_CALLBACK we can even kill
timer->state altogether, but this is another story.

What do you think?


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-08 17:21    [W:0.170 / U:1.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site