Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:47:51 +0200 | From | Richard Weinberger <> | Subject | Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 |
| |
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community >>> members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on >>> with things at the moment. >>> >>> We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and >>> will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle. There still >>> seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time >>> to review this can be sorted out. We have asked distributions to start >>> testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real >>> world testing. We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and >>> optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull >>> request for the next release cycle. >> >> I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and >> have a question. >> Where does all the development happen? >> >> For example your current tree contains the following commit: >> >> commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33 >> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> >> Date: Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200 >> >> kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation >> >> The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl >> supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we >> do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if >> KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> >> Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> >> >> Where was this patch posted to? > > There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list > with this patch in it, along with others.
I saw the pull request on LKML but not the patch. That's why I'm asking. :)
Thanks, //richard
| |