Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:45:23 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2 |
| |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Greg, > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on > > with things at the moment. > > > > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and > > will be delaying the kdbus merge request for another cycle. There still > > seems to be some disagreement and we are confident that with more time > > to review this can be sorted out. We have asked distributions to start > > testing kdbus and have already gotten back valuable feedback from real > > world testing. We are incorporating that feedback, fixing bugs, and > > optimizing some internal details which will all be part of the pull > > request for the next release cycle. > > I've started digging into current kdbus to understand the changes you made and > have a question. > Where does all the development happen? > > For example your current tree contains the following commit: > > commit f3adf84302fb4fdb6698cf129b96546b47e27d33 > Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> > Date: Thu May 21 20:03:29 2015 +0200 > > kdbus: skip mandatory items on negotiation > > The kdbus negotiation is used to figure out what items and flags an ioctl > supports. It is highly impractical to pass in mandatory items when all we > do is negotiation. Therefore, allow user-space to skip mandatory items if > KDBUS_FLAG_NEGOTIATE is passed. > > Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> > > Where was this patch posted to?
There was a pull request that happened on the linux-kernel mailing list with this patch in it, along with others.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |