Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Sergei Zviagintsev <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/3] kdbus: optimize if statements in kdbus_conn_disconnect() | Date | Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:14:58 +0300 |
| |
if (r->sync) branch and code after it both call kdbus_reply_unlink(). Rewrite them as if-else to eliminate code duplication and make algorithm more obvious.
Convert outer if statement to use continue in order to reduce indentation and make things easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@s15v.net> --- ipc/kdbus/connection.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c index 707be050b408..9993753d11de 100644 --- a/ipc/kdbus/connection.c +++ b/ipc/kdbus/connection.c @@ -559,17 +559,16 @@ int kdbus_conn_disconnect(struct kdbus_conn *conn, bool ensure_queue_empty) hash_for_each(bus->conn_hash, i, c, hentry) { mutex_lock(&c->lock); list_for_each_entry_safe(r, r_tmp, &c->reply_list, entry) { - if (r->reply_src == conn) { - if (r->sync) { - kdbus_sync_reply_wakeup(r, -EPIPE); - kdbus_reply_unlink(r); - continue; - } + if (r->reply_src != conn) + continue; + if (r->sync) + kdbus_sync_reply_wakeup(r, -EPIPE); + else /* send a 'connection dead' notification */ kdbus_notify_reply_dead(bus, c->id, r->cookie); - kdbus_reply_unlink(r); - } + + kdbus_reply_unlink(r); } mutex_unlock(&c->lock); } -- 1.8.3.1
| |