lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] driver/i2c/mux: Add register based mux i2c-mux-reg


On 06/17/2015 08:03 AM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 16/06/15 19:28, ext York Sun wrote:
>> Based on i2c-mux-gpio driver, similarly the register based mux
>> switch from one bus to another by setting a single register.
>> The register can be on PCIe bus, local bus, or any memory-mapped
>> address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>> CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>> CC: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-reg.txt | 69 ++++++
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig | 11 +
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c | 239 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.h | 38 ++++
>> 5 files changed, 358 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-reg.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.h
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-reg.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-reg.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ad7cc4f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-reg.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
>> +Register-based I2C Bus Mux
>> +
>> +This binding describes an I2C bus multiplexer that uses a single regsiter
> ^^^^^^^^

Nice catch.

>
>> +to route the I2C signals.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: i2c-mux-reg
>> +- i2c-parent: The phandle of the I2C bus that this multiplexer's master-side
>> + port is connected to.
>> +* Standard I2C mux properties. See mux.txt in this directory.
>> +* I2C child bus nodes. See mux.txt in this directory.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- reg: this pair of <offset size> specifies the register to control the mux.
>> + The <offset size> depends on its parent node. It can be any memory-mapped
>> + address. If omitted, the resource of this device will be used.
>> +- idle-state: value to set the muxer to when idle. When no value is
>> + given, it defaults to the last value used.
>> +
>> +For each i2c child node, an I2C child bus will be created. They will
>> +be numbered based on their order in the device tree.
>> +
>> +Whenever an access is made to a device on a child bus, the value set
>> +in the revelant node's reg property will be output to the register.
>> +
>> +If an idle state is defined, using the idle-state (optional) property,
>> +whenever an access is not being made to a device on a child bus, the
>> +register will be set according to the idle value.
>> +
>> +If an idle state is not defined, the most recently used value will be
>> +left programmed into the register.
>> +
>> +Example of a mux on PCIe card, the host is a powerpc SoC (big endian):
>> +
>> + i2c-mux {
>> + /* the <offset size> depends on the address translation
>> + * of the parent device. If omitted, device resource
>> + * will be used instead.
>> + */
>> + reg = <0x6028 0x4>;
>> + compatible = "i2c-mux-reg";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + i2c-parent = <&i2c1>;
>> + i2c@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + si5338: clock-generator@70 {
>> + compatible = "silabs,si5338";
>> + reg = <0x70>;
>> + /* other stuff */
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c@1 {
>> + /* data is in little endian on pcie bus */
>> + reg = <0x01000000>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + si5338: clock-generator@70 {
>> + compatible = "silabs,si5338";
>> + reg = <0x70>;
>> + /* other stuff */
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
>> index f6d313e..77c1257 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig
>> @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ config I2C_MUX_GPIO
>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>> will be called i2c-mux-gpio.
>>
>> +config I2C_MUX_REG
>> + tristate "Register-based I2C multiplexer"
>> + help
>> + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for a
>> + register based I2C multiplexer. This driver provides access to
>> + I2C busses connected through a MUX, which is controlled
>> + by a sinple register.
>> +
>> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>> + will be called i2c-mux-reg.
>> +
>> config I2C_MUX_PCA9541
>> tristate "NXP PCA9541 I2C Master Selector"
>> help
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile
>> index 465778b..bc517bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/Makefile
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ARB_GPIO_CHALLENGE) += i2c-arb-gpio-challenge.o
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) += i2c-mux-gpio.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_REG) += i2c-mux-reg.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_PCA9541) += i2c-mux-pca9541.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_PCA954x) += i2c-mux-pca954x.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_PINCTRL) += i2c-mux-pinctrl.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..03ce858
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
>> +/*
>> + * I2C multiplexer using a single register
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor
>> + * York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c-mux.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include "i2c-mux-reg.h"
>> +
>> +struct regmux {
>> + struct i2c_adapter *parent;
>> + struct i2c_adapter **adap; /* child busses */
>> + struct i2c_mux_reg_platform_data data;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_set(const struct regmux *mux, unsigned int chan)
>> +{
>> + if (!mux->data.reg || chan < 0 || chan > mux->data.n_values)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + *mux->data.reg = mux->data.values[chan];
>
> Oh, I believe, this will not work. This will not work for PCI, because it's
> a "posted" bus, it will not work on certain high-performance SoC like Octeon,
> where writes to the memory are buffered... Finally your I2C transfer can
> be performed before this write will be completed (if at all), because there
> is no synchronization here. You probably want to use some iowrite*(), but
> maybe also accomplish it with readback. There are ARM architectures where
> writes to memory mapped HW modules are only ordered inside one module, but
> not ordered between the modules, etc... Without volatile a good compiler
> will optimize this statement away completely as it produces no "side effect".


Agree I should have used iowrite.

>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_select(struct i2c_adapter *adap, void *data,
>> + unsigned int chan)
>> +{
>> + struct regmux *mux = data;
>> +
>> + return i2c_mux_reg_set(mux, chan);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_deselect(struct i2c_adapter *adap, void *data,
>> + unsigned int chan)
>> +{
>> + struct regmux *mux = data;
>> +
>> + return i2c_mux_reg_set(mux, mux->data.idle);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(struct regmux *mux,
>> + struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct device_node *adapter_np, *child;
>> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
>> + struct resource res;
>> + unsigned *values;
>> + int i = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + adapter_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "i2c-parent", 0);
>> + if (!adapter_np) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> + adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
>> + if (!adapter) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot find parent bus\n");
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + }
>> + mux->parent = adapter;
>> + mux->data.parent = i2c_adapter_id(adapter);
>> + put_device(&adapter->dev);
>> +
>> + mux->data.n_values = of_get_child_count(np);
>> +
>> + values = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> + sizeof(*mux->data.values) * mux->data.n_values,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!values) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot allocate values array");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>> + of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> + mux->data.values = values;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
>> + mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_REG_NO_IDLE;
>> +
>> + /* map address from "reg" if exists */
>> + if (!of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res)) {
>> + mux->data.reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, &res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mux->data.reg))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mux->data.reg);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
>> + struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct regmux *mux;
>> + struct i2c_adapter *parent;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + int (*deselect)(struct i2c_adapter *, void *, u32);
>> + unsigned int initial_state, class;
>> + int i, ret, nr;
>> +
>> + mux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mux)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mux);
>> +
>> + if (dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev)) {
>> + memcpy(&mux->data, dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev),
>> + sizeof(mux->data));
>> +
>> + parent = i2c_get_adapter(mux->data.parent);
>> + if (!parent) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Parent adapter (%d) not found\n",
>> + mux->data.parent);
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + }
>> + mux->parent = parent;
>> + i2c_put_adapter(parent);
>
> You should only give up this reference in remove() function of your driver.
>
>> + } else {
>> + ret = i2c_mux_reg_probe_dt(mux, pdev);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot locate device tree");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!mux->data.reg) {
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Register not set, using platform resource\n");
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + mux->data.reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mux->data.reg))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mux->data.reg);
>> + }
>> +
>> + mux->adap = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>> + sizeof(*mux->adap) * mux->data.n_values,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!mux->adap) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot allocate i2c_adapter structure");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (mux->data.idle != I2C_MUX_REG_NO_IDLE) {
>> + initial_state = mux->data.idle;
>> + deselect = i2c_mux_reg_deselect;
>> + } else {
>> + initial_state = mux->data.values[0];
>> + deselect = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_values; i++) {
>> + nr = mux->data.base_nr ? (mux->data.base_nr + i) : 0;
>> + class = mux->data.classes ? mux->data.classes[i] : 0;
>> +
>> + mux->adap[i] = i2c_add_mux_adapter(mux->parent, &pdev->dev, mux,
>> + nr, mux->data.values[i],
>> + class, i2c_mux_reg_select,
>> + deselect);
>> + if (!mux->adap[i]) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add adapter %d\n", i);
>> + goto add_adapter_failed;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%d port mux on %s adapter\n",
>> + mux->data.n_values, mux->parent->name);
>
> This could be dev_dbg() also, IMHO, as this information has very little value.

Sure.

>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +add_adapter_failed:
>> + for (; i > 0; i--)
>> + i2c_del_mux_adapter(mux->adap[i - 1]);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int i2c_mux_reg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct regmux *mux = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_values; i++)
>> + i2c_del_mux_adapter(mux->adap[i]);
>> +
>> + i2c_put_adapter(mux->parent);
>> +
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Removed\n");
>
> I would say, only dev_dbg() is allowed here, otherwise it's a noise.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id i2c_mux_reg_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "i2c-mux-reg", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, i2c_mux_reg_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver i2c_mux_reg_driver = {
>> + .probe = i2c_mux_reg_probe,
>> + .remove = i2c_mux_reg_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .name = "i2c-mux-reg",
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_platform_driver(i2c_mux_reg_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Register-based I2C multiplexer driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:i2c-mux-reg");
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.h b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e213988
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
>> +/*
>> + * I2C multiplexer using a single register
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2015 Freescale Semiconductor
>> + * York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __LINUX_I2C_MUX_REG_H
>> +#define __LINUX_I2C_MUX_REG_H
>> +
>> +/* MUX has no specific idel mode */
> ^^^^
>
>> +#define I2C_MUX_REG_NO_IDLE ((unsigned)-1)
>
> What if the idle state is exactly "all ones"? Quite important corner case actually...

Good point. If all values are considered possible, I guess the solution will be
adding another "valid" variable to vouch for this one.

>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct i2c_mux_reg_platform_data - Platform-dependent data for i2c-mux-reg
>> + * @parent: Parent I2C bus adapter number
>> + * @base_nr: Base I2C bus number to number adapters from or zero for dynamic
>> + * @values: Array of value for each channel
>> + * @n_values: Number of multiplexer channels
>> + * @classes: Optional I2C auto-detection classes
>> + * @idle: Value to write to mux when idle
>> + * @reg: Virtual address of the register to switch channel
>> + */
>> +struct i2c_mux_reg_platform_data {
>> + int parent;
>> + int base_nr;
>> + const unsigned int *values;
>> + int n_values;
>> + const unsigned int *classes;
>> + unsigned int idle;
>> + unsigned int *reg;
>
> Yeah, this is really bad idea. You maybe want something like
> __iomem "cookie" here instead of this bare pointer.

Let me try.

>
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* __LINUX_I2C_MUX_REG_H */
>>
>
> Other than the mentioned above, this is a useful code.
>

Thanks for the encouragement. I will send an update soon.

York



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-06-17 19:01    [W:0.392 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site