lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/11] Miscellaneous stability patches
From
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This set of patches mainly contains fix for some memory issues
>> using quite aggressively surfaces and other minor problems like
>> images going black after a while.
>>
>> Frediano Ziglio (11):
>> Do not cause spice-server to clean our objects
>> Do not leak memory if qxl_release_list_add fails
>> Fix print statement not using uninitialized variable
>> Avoid double free on error
>> Handle all errors in qxl_surface_evict
>> Fix return for qxl_release_alloc
>> Handle correctly failures in qxl_alloc_relase_reserved
>> Remove format string errors
>> Move main reference counter to GEM object instead of TTM ones
>> Simplify cleaning qxl processing command
>> Propagate correctly errors from qxlhw_handle_to_bo
>>
>> qxl/qxl_cmd.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> qxl/qxl_display.c | 2 +-
>> qxl/qxl_drv.h | 2 +-
>> qxl/qxl_gem.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> qxl/qxl_ioctl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>> qxl/qxl_object.c | 11 ++++-------
>> qxl/qxl_release.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 7 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> The strip level on these patches is rather odd. Normally one would
> see a strip level of 1 at the top of the kernel dir. E.g.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_gem.c
>
> in the diffstat, etc.

(Sorry for the double reply.)

Also, are any of these commits something that should be queued for
stable kernel releases? There are a handful that look like they
should be to me.

josh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-27 15:21    [W:0.608 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site