lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] mm:cma - Fix for typos in comments.
Date

Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
---
mm/cma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
return -EINVAL;

- /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
+ /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);

/* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
/*
* high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
* address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the
- * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
+ * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
* the physical address from it. On x86 there is a validation check for
* this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
*/
--
1.7.9.5


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-23 07:41    [W:0.088 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site