lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] spmi: add command tracepoints for SPMI
From
> On 05/20, Ankit Gupta wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:36:41 -0700
>> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> > On 05/18/15 14:51, Ankit Gupta wrote:
>> > > +
>> > > +TRACE_EVENT(spmi_read_end,
>> > > + TP_PROTO(u8 opcode, u8 sid, u16 addr, int ret, u8 len,
>> >
>> > Should "len" be size_t instead of u8? It would at least match the
>> > implementation of spmi_controller::read_cmd(). Same comment for the
>> > write side.
>> >
>> > -Stephen
>>
>> I see no reason to spend to 4-8 bytes when spmi spec allows for maximum
>> buffer size of 16. Do you suggest changing the API of read_cmd()?
>> >
>
> Is that a maximum buffer size of 16 bytes? I'd prefer consistency
> with the API that's being traced, that's all. Changing it to u8
> to save a few bytes probably doesn't make any difference if the
> architecture passes function arguments in CPU registers which are
> 32 or 64 bits wide or if the function can be inlined enough by
> the compiler to where the len parameter is kept in a register.
>
Thanks Stephen for your comments. Will change it to size_t.
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-21 23:01    [W:0.055 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site