lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Date
Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 13:38:24 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
> >> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
> >
> > Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and
> > inclusion into
> > the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has
> > way
> > better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves
> > than accusing them of bad faith.
> >
> > Its yours to choose.
> >
> > What outcome do you want to create?
>
> The outcome I would like is:
>
> * Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past,
> not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and
> collegial conduct.
>
> * Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and
> testers and move it along faster.
>
> * I left LKML better than I found it.
>
> * Group hugs
>
> Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational.

Great stuff!

Looking forward to it.

Thank you,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-13 23:21    [W:1.589 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site