lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
Date
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:25:38 PM PDT, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 12:37:41 schrieb Daniel Phillips:
>> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: ...
>
> Daniel, if you want to change the process of patch review and
> inclusion into
> the kernel, model an example of how you would like it to be. This has way
> better chances to inspire others to change their behaviors themselves than
> accusing them of bad faith.
>
> Its yours to choose.
>
> What outcome do you want to create?

The outcome I would like is:

* Everybody has a good think about what has gone wrong in the past,
not only with troublesome submitters, but with mutual respect and
collegial conduct.

* Tux3 is merged on its merits so we get more developers and
testers and move it along faster.

* I left LKML better than I found it.

* Group hugs

Well, group hugs are optional, that one would be situational.

Regards,

Daniel




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-13 23:01    [W:0.187 / U:0.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site