lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [rtc-linux] [PATCH V1 3/6] rtc: da9062: DA9062 RTC driver
Date
Hi Guenter & Alexandre,

On 13 May 2015 14:47 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 06:37 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 13/05/2015 at 06:04:47 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote :
> >> Don't know how this is handled for rtc drivers, but in other subsystems
> >> we just live with the original name. I don't see a need to rename a driver
> >> just because it starts supporting more hardware, and xxx is weird anyway
> >> since it suggests everything from 000 to 999, which is much worse than
> >> just sticking with 9063.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, in particular if at some point in time a new IP matching those xxx
> > is completely different from the previous one. I'm not fond of renaming
> > the driver either but if diasemi thinks that what they want, I'm open to
> > let it happen. But clearly, I don't want to end up in a situation like
> > the tlv320aic where you don't know which driver correspond to which
> > chip:
> >
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic31xx.c
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic31xx.h
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4.c
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4.h
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.h
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
> > sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.h
> >
> > Go figure that the tlv320aic3104 can be supported by both tlv320aic3x.c
> > and tlv320aic32x4.c but not tlv320aic31xx.c...
> >
>
> Unfortunately that is exactly what is going to happen.

Thanks for this clarification.
We'll follow your advice and keep the name as da9063

Regards,
Steve



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-05-13 17:21    [W:0.098 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site