Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 01 May 2015 11:27:21 -0600 | From | Jeffrey Hugo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: qcom: Lock #7 is special lock, uses dynamic proc_id |
| |
On 5/1/2015 11:06 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c > index 93b62e0..043c62c 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/qcom_hwspinlock.c > @@ -25,16 +25,26 @@ > > #include "hwspinlock_internal.h" > > -#define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1 > -#define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32 > +#define QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID 1 > +#define QCOM_MUTEX_CPUIDLE_OFFSET 128 > +#define QCOM_CPUIDLE_LOCK 7 > +#define QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS 32 > +
This part of the diff doesn't look right. Why is it showing that QCOM_MUTEX_APPS_PROC_ID and QCOM_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS are deleted and added lines? Shouldn't they be unchanged by this patch?
-- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |