[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usb: musb: Kconfig: Depend on some machines under blackfin
On 4/5/15 16:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:33:44AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 4/4/15 17:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 05:51:21AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> Under blackfin, only bf527, bf548 and bf609 may use musb. The related
>>>> error with allmodconfig:
>>>> CC [M] drivers/usb/misc/trancevibrator.o
>>>> In file included from drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h:70:0,
>>>> from drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:103:
>>>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'musb_indexed_ep_select':
>>>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h:458:32: error: 'USB_INDEX' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>> #define MUSB_INDEX USB_OFFSET(USB_INDEX) /* 8 bit */
>>>> ^
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <>
>>> Why not fix the root cause and provide this symbol on blackfin? There's
>>> no specific reason why it shouldn't be able to be built on this
>>> platform.
>>> It's better to make platforms properly build everything, patches like
>>> this just make things messier and harder to maintain.
>> I am not quite sure all machines of blackfin can support musb (according
>> to current code, at present, we can only sure bf527, bf548 and bf609 can
>> support it).
> What do you mean by "can support"? What is missing? Why doesn't the
> code build there?

Only some of machines of blackfin define USB_INDEX, but machine bf533 (
which is in current building configuration) does not define USB_INDEX,
so cause building break. The related information:

[root@localhost arch]# grep -rn "\<USB_INDEX\>" *
blackfin/kernel/debug-mmrs.c:1587: D16(USB_INDEX);
blackfin/mach-bf527/include/mach/cdefBF525.h:33:#define bfin_read_USB_INDEX() bfin_read16(USB_INDEX)
blackfin/mach-bf527/include/mach/cdefBF525.h:34:#define bfin_write_USB_INDEX(val) bfin_write16(USB_INDEX, val)
blackfin/mach-bf527/include/mach/defBF525.h:24:#define USB_INDEX 0xffc03824 /* Index register for selecting the indexed endpoint registers */
blackfin/mach-bf527/include/mach/defBF525.h:394:/* Bit masks for USB_INDEX */
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/cdefBF542.h:153:#define bfin_read_USB_INDEX() bfin_read16(USB_INDEX)
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/cdefBF542.h:154:#define bfin_write_USB_INDEX(val) bfin_write16(USB_INDEX, val)
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/cdefBF547.h:320:#define bfin_read_USB_INDEX() bfin_read16(USB_INDEX)
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/cdefBF547.h:321:#define bfin_write_USB_INDEX(val) bfin_write16(USB_INDEX, val)
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF542.h:88:#define USB_INDEX 0xffc03c24 /* Index register for selecting the indexed endpoint registers */
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF542.h:571:/* Bit masks for USB_INDEX */
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF547.h:202:#define USB_INDEX 0xffc03c24 /* Index register for selecting the indexed endpoint registers */
blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF547.h:848:/* Bit masks for USB_INDEX */
blackfin/mach-bf609/include/mach/defBF60x_base.h:3262:#define USB_INDEX 0xFFCC100E /* USB Index */

USB_INDEX is one of core macro for musb, so I guess, bf533 and other
blackfin machines which do not define USB_INDEX can not support musb.

>> So, I suggest to add new macro HAVE_MUSB for BLACKFIN in patch v2. And
>> welcome any other members' idea.
> I recommend fixing blackfin, what makes this one specific platform so
> broken compared to the 20+ other platforms that don't need this special
> treatment?

Originally, I try to remove CONFIG_BLACKFIN in source code, but it seems
not quite easy, and the original related git commit:

commit c6cf8b003e5a37f8193c2883876c5942adcd7284
Author: Bryan Wu <>
Date: Tue Dec 2 21:33:48 2008 +0200

USB: musb: add Blackfin specific configuration to MUSB

Some config registers are not avaiable in Blackfin, we have to comment them out.

- remove Blackfin specific header file
- add Blackfin register version to musb_regs.h header file

Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <>

So for me, only CONFIG_BLACKFIN can not be sure it must support musb, we
have to define a new config macro HAVE_MUSB (or SUPPORT_MUSB) for it (at
least, within blackfin).

Welcome other members ideas (especially blackfin related members).

Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-05 17:41    [W:0.050 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site