lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] Sync and VFS scalability improvements
On Tue 10-03-15 15:45:15, Josef Bacik wrote:
> These are patches that Dave Chinner wrote two years ago that are still very much
> needed today. I recently ran into a problem where I had millions of inodes that
> needed to be evicted at unmount time and it soft locked up the box and kept any
> other file system from doing work. These patches fix this problem by breaking
> the inode_sb_list_lock into per-sb, and then converting the per sb inode list
> into a list_lru for better scalability.
>
> I've also pulled forward Dave's sync scalability patches which still seem pretty
> relevant. I had to fix a couple of these to bring them forward but I touched
> very little and I've preserved the authorship of everything. I added the
> Reviewed-by's that were there when the patches were originally submitted. I've
> run this through xfstests on btrfs and xfs and verified that everything seems to
> be working. If you are interested the original submission can be found here
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/561569/
>
> Finally the last patch is from me and this fixes the softlockup problems I was
> seeing on unmount with a large amount of inodes that needed to be evicted.
Just a general process note - when resending patches like this, you
should add your Signed-off-by. We know both you and Dave well so it's
mostly a cosmetic thing but it's better to do it anyway...

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-16 13:01    [W:0.688 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site