Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 02/12] block, bfq: add full hierarchical scheduling and cgroups support | From | Paolo Valente <> | Date | Fri, 30 May 2014 23:49:24 +0200 |
| |
Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 17:39, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:37:18AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:05:33AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >>> index 768fe44..cdd2528 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h >>> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ SUBSYS(net_cls) >>> SUBSYS(blkio) >>> #endif >>> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_BFQIO) >>> +SUBSYS(bfqio) >>> +#endif >> >> So, ummm, I don't think this is a good idea. Why aren't you plugging >> into the blkcg infrastructure as cfq does? Why does it need to be a >> separate controller? > > If there's something which doesn't work for bfq in blkcg, please let > me know. I'd be happy to make it work. >
This will probably be very useful for us.
Thanks a lot, Paolo
> Thanks. > > -- > tejun
-- Paolo Valente Algogroup Dipartimento di Fisica, Informatica e Matematica Via Campi, 213/B 41125 Modena - Italy homepage: http://algogroup.unimore.it/people/paolo/
| |