Messages in this thread | | | From | Julian Calaby <> | Date | Thu, 22 May 2014 09:31:36 +1000 | Subject | Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c |
| |
Hi Rajkumar,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:12:26PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi Rajkumar, >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan >> <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote: >> >> Building with the attached random configuration file, >> >> >> >> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0, >> >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27, >> >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18: >> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’: >> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >> >> has no member named ‘debug’ >> >> pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts); >> >> ^ >> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of >> >> macro ‘ath_dbg’ >> >> ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ >> >> ^ >> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >> >> has no member named ‘debug’ >> >> sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts; >> >> ^ >> >> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1 >> > >> > Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS. >> >> The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really >> unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even >> if they're utterly insane. >> >> You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs >> to prevent this from being possible. >> > Completely agree. But ath9k Kconfig has proper dependecy for > ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS. I am wondering how it is selected w/o ATH9K_DEBUGFS. > > config ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS > def_bool y > depends on ATH9K_DEBUGFS && ATH9K_DFS_CERTIFIED > > Should it be like this? > > config ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS > def_bool y if (ATH9K_DEBUGFS && ATH9K_DFS_CERTIFIED)
Zefir already posted a patch to fix this particular issue.
Judging by the patch, not all of the debugfs using code was properly enclosed in #ifdefs.
Thanks,
-- Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |