Messages in this thread | | | From | Julian Calaby <> | Date | Wed, 21 May 2014 22:12:26 +1000 | Subject | Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c |
| |
Hi Rajkumar,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote: >> Building with the attached random configuration file, >> >> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0, >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27, >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18: >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’: >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >> has no member named ‘debug’ >> pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts); >> ^ >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of >> macro ‘ath_dbg’ >> ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ >> ^ >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ >> has no member named ‘debug’ >> sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts; >> ^ >> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1 > > Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS.
The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even if they're utterly insane.
You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs to prevent this from being possible.
Thanks,
-- Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |