Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:33:00 -0400 | From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation |
| |
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:12:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:27PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying > > > to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the > > > equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org > > > > > > You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. > > > > > > I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this > > > moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm. > > > > Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org on your patches Peter? > > I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-( > > No of course not :-) > > Also as noted elsewhere, I didn't actually do any PV muck yet. I spend > the time trying to get my head around patch 1; all the while Waiman kept > piling more and more on top.
Ah, I see. Looking forward to seeing your 'muck' code then :-)
Thanks!
| |