Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:14:52 -0400 (EDT) | From | Vince Weaver <> | Subject | Re: [perf] yet another 32/64-bit range check failure |
| |
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> This is allowing events to be allocated memory but not being freed somehow > before returning EINVAL (a memory leak). > At least it looks like this is happening in the huge traces I have trying > to track down the perf_fuzzer memory corruption bug.
I can't find where the memory leak happens, but it looks like this in the trace:
[ 3524.626452] perf_fuz-1798 0.... 1271584315us : sys_enter: NR 298 (698e40, 706, ffffffff, f, 800000000000, 800000000000) [ 3524.642312] perf_fuz-1798 0.... 1271584324us : kmalloc: call_site=ffffffff8113a575 ptr=ffff88007d5b0800 bytes_req=1272 bytes_alloc=2048 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO [ 3524.662598] perf_fuz-1798 0.... 1271584337us : sys_exit: NR 298 = -22
The call site for the kmalloc is in perf_event_alloc()
The memory is eventually freed as:
[ 3547.895534] <idle>-0 0.Ns. 1271595088us : kfree: call_site=ffffffff811316aa ptr=ffff88007d5b0800
Vince
| |