Re: [perf] yet another 32/64-bit range check failure
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote: > > I suppose I should make a patch for attr->sample_type and > attr->read_format which after a quick audit seem to exhibit the same > problem?
nevermind, PERF_FORMAT_MAX and PERF_SAMPLE_MAX are enum values, not #defines, so they handle being 64-bit properly.