Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | [PATCH V2 10/19] tick-common: call tick_check_percpu() from tick_check_preferred() | Date | Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:25:06 +0530 |
| |
tick_check_percpu() and tick_check_preferred() are called from two places and in exactly same order. So, would make sense to call tick_check_percpu() from tick_check_preferred() instead, so that their caller can just call tick_check_preferred().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 965e9c3..9d3106b 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ static bool tick_check_percpu(struct clock_event_device *curdev, static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev, struct clock_event_device *newdev) { + if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) + return false; + /* Prefer oneshot capable device */ if (!(newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)) { if (curdev && (curdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)) @@ -257,9 +260,6 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev, bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev, struct clock_event_device *newdev) { - if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id())) - return false; - return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev); } @@ -276,10 +276,6 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev) if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask)) goto out_bc; - /* cpu local device ? */ - if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, cpu)) - goto out_bc; - /* Preference decision */ if (!tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev)) goto out_bc; -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
| |