lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix
From
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
>> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
>> #define __NR_finit_module 344
>> #define __NR_sched_setattr 345
>> #define __NR_sched_getattr 346
>> -#define NR_syscalls 345
>> +#define NR_syscalls 347
>>
>> /*
>> * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some
>
> Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly?
> I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have
> added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.

No, I don't mean to upstream directly. So you can just drop my submission...

Thanks,
Miklos


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-11 14:21    [W:0.336 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site