Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Mar 2014 13:33:37 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] score: remove unused CPU_SCORE7 Kconfig parameter | From | Lennox Wu <> |
| |
Actually, people I don't want to brother are guys intergrate all patches on the maillist. There are too many patches whaic are waiting they to process. I will check the development progress of the another Score and consider if we should remove the config. Thanks for your suggestion.
Best, Lennox
2014-03-09 5:02 GMT+08:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>: > On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 04:27 +0800, Lennox Wu wrote: >> 2014-03-09 4:00 GMT+08:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>: >> > In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/76 I already reported that this >> > Kconfig symbol was unused. Why can't it be dropped and re-added when >> > code is added to the tree that actually uses it? >> >> Because I don't think droping it is meaningful, since it will be used. > > But, again, it isn't used now and hasn't actually been used in years. > >> Moreover, the symbol never affect other architectures or subsystems. >> I feel that is not good to brother people to process the unimportant patch. > > Sure, this is just a small cleanup. But the scripts people use to see > whether more serious Kconfig related issues have entered the tree will > likely notice CPU_SCORE7. (And those people will have to investigate why > that symbol is unused - which might take quite a bit of work - to > determine what needs to be done about it.) So whenever someone, not > following this thread, runs a script like that the score maintainers > might receive a similar patch again. > > And I don't believe that handling a single cleanup patch is particularly > burdensome for the score maintainers. > > > Paul Bolle >
| |