lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] cpufreq: don't print value of .driver_data from core
Date
CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is completely
driver specific. This can contain any value and not only indexes. For most of
the drivers, which aren't using this field, its value is zero. So, printing this
from core doesn't make any sense. Don't print it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 8e54f97..f002272 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
&& table[i].driver_data == CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ)
continue;

- pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz, %u driver_data\n",
- i, freq, table[i].driver_data);
+ pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
if (freq < min_freq)
min_freq = freq;
if (freq > max_freq)
@@ -175,8 +174,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
} else
*index = optimal.driver_data;

- pr_debug("target is %u (%u kHz, %u)\n", *index, table[*index].frequency,
- table[*index].driver_data);
+ pr_debug("target index is %u, freq is:%u kHz\n", *index,
+ table[*index].frequency);

return 0;
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-27 11:41    [W:1.847 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site