Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kallsyms: handle special absolute symbols | Date | Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:10:35 +1030 |
| |
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes: > Why not just do this with 0-base-address detection like my v2? That > would mean we don't need to remember to add this flag in the future to > imagined new architectures that might want this 0-based per_cpu > feature.
Because future architectures will get this right and emit absolute symbols. I hope!
I'm swamped at the moment, but am hoping to investigate that for x86-64. This is a stop-gap.
Cheers, Rusty.
| |