Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:23:37 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kallsyms: handle special absolute symbols | From | Kees Cook <> |
| |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes: >> Why not just do this with 0-base-address detection like my v2? That >> would mean we don't need to remember to add this flag in the future to >> imagined new architectures that might want this 0-based per_cpu >> feature. > > Because future architectures will get this right and emit absolute > symbols. I hope! > > I'm swamped at the moment, but am hoping to investigate that for > x86-64. This is a stop-gap.
Okay, I'm convinced. :)
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Thanks!
-Kees
-- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security
| |