Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:22:48 +0100 | From | Richard Cochran <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v1 0/9] ptp: dynamic pin control |
| |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 07:58:37AM +0100, Christian Riesch wrote: > >I did not change the n_per_out in this series, > > Why not? I think it would be a good idea to set both n_ext_ts and > n_per_out to the correct value right from the start (8, right?). > Christian
Yes, it is a good idea, but it is a little extra work, especially testing it. Channels 0 and 1 must be programmed differently, IIRC.
Right now, I am focusing on:
1. getting the new ioctl interface right 2. making it work for the phyter while keeping the module params.
After that, as I said before:
> >but once this basic > >support gets merged, then you will be able to increase n_per_out for > >the dp83640 with little extra effort.
Thanks, Richard
| |