lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Memory allocator semantics
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 01/02/2014 10:33 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From what I can see, the Linux-kernel's SLAB, SLOB, and SLUB memory
> >allocators would deal with the following sort of race:
> >
> >A. CPU 0: r1 = kmalloc(...); ACCESS_ONCE(gp) = r1;
> >
> > CPU 1: r2 = ACCESS_ONCE(gp); if (r2) kfree(r2);
> >
> >However, my guess is that this should be considered an accident of the
> >current implementation rather than a feature. The reason for this is
> >that I cannot see how you would usefully do (A) above without also allowing
> >(B) and (C) below, both of which look to me to be quite destructive:
> >
> >B. CPU 0: r1 = kmalloc(...); ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x) = r1;
> >
> > CPU 1: r2 = ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x); if (r2) kfree(r2);
> >
> > CPU 2: r3 = ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x); if (r3) kfree(r3);
> >
> > This results in the memory being on two different freelists.
> >
> >C. CPU 0: r1 = kmalloc(...); ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x) = r1;
> >
> > CPU 1: r2 = ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x); r2->a = 1; r2->b = 2;
> >
> > CPU 2: r3 = ACCESS_ONCE(shared_x); if (r3) kfree(r3);
> >
> > CPU 3: r4 = kmalloc(...); r4->s = 3; r4->t = 4;
> >
> > This results in the memory being used by two different CPUs,
> > each of which believe that they have sole access.
> >
> >But I thought I should ask the experts.
> >
> >So, am I correct that kernel hackers are required to avoid "drive-by"
> >kfree()s of kmalloc()ed memory?
>
> So to be completely honest, I don't understand what is the race in
> (A) that concerns the *memory allocator*. I also don't what the
> memory allocator can do in (B) and (C) which look like double-free
> and use-after-free, respectively, to me. :-)

From what I can see, (A) works by accident, but is kind of useless because
you allocate and free the memory without touching it. (B) and (C) are the
lightest touches I could imagine, and as you say, both are bad. So I
believe that it is reasonable to prohibit (A).

Or is there some use for (A) that I am missing?

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-09 03:21    [W:1.097 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site