[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Memory allocator semantics
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> So to be completely honest, I don't understand what is the race in (A) that
> concerns the *memory allocator*. I also don't what the memory allocator can
> do in (B) and (C) which look like double-free and use-after-free,
> respectively, to me. :-)

Well it seems to be some academic mind game to me.

Does an invocation of the allocator have barrier semantics or not?

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-14 19:01    [W:0.167 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site