Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:07:58 -0600 (CST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: Memory allocator semantics |
| |
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> So to be completely honest, I don't understand what is the race in (A) that > concerns the *memory allocator*. I also don't what the memory allocator can > do in (B) and (C) which look like double-free and use-after-free, > respectively, to me. :-)
Well it seems to be some academic mind game to me.
Does an invocation of the allocator have barrier semantics or not?
|  |