Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:07:21 +0900 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] MFD: da9052: Add new DA9053 BC chip variant |
| |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:40:50PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > The advice here is usually that sending against -next is a good proxy > > for sending against the individual tree without having to figure out all > > the different trees - almost all of the time the effect is the same. > > This only applies when sending patches via e-mail, for git pulls it's an > > absolute no of course.
> Good point. But it's worth reiterating that this should only be done > if you have dependencies which haven't yet reached Mainline.
It can be worth doing anyway with a subsystem that's actively developed since sometimees the dependencies are the other way - the APIs in Linus' tree may have gone away. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |