Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:15:55 +0900 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] MFD: da9052: Add new DA9053 BC chip variant |
| |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:50:36AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> I am. The trouble with basing your patches against -next is that it's > not stable, in that it is rebuilt every day. If your patches are > dependant on commits which haven't reached Mainline yet, then you > should rebase on the subsystem tree which they are contained in. All > patches in -next should be based on an -rc or a released kernel version.
The advice here is usually that sending against -next is a good proxy for sending against the individual tree without having to figure out all the different trees - almost all of the time the effect is the same. This only applies when sending patches via e-mail, for git pulls it's an absolute no of course. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |