lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[BISECTED] Xen HVM guest hangs since 3.12-rc5
I've been running into problems on an Xen HVM domU. I've got a guest with NUMA
enabled, 60GB of RAM, and 3 disks attached (including root volume). 2 of the
disks are in an MD RAID0 in the guest, with an ext4 filesystem on top of that.
I was running the fio 'iometer-file-access-server.fio' example config against
that fs. During this workload, it would eventually cause a soft lockup, like
the below:

[ 2536.250054] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [kworker/u257:0:7]
[ 2536.250054] Modules linked in: isofs crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd raid0 md_mod acpi_cpufreq psmouse i2c_piix4 intel_agp intel_gtt i2c_core processor serio_raw evdev microcode ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 ata_generic pata_acpi ata_piix libata scsi_mod floppy ixgbevf xen_privcmd xen_netfront xen_kbdfront syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops xen_blkfront virtio_pci virtio_net virtio_blk virtio_ring virtio ipmi_poweroff ipmi_msghandler button
[ 2536.250054] CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u257:0 Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc4-bisect-00073-g6fe6b2d #26
[ 2536.250054] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.2.amazon 01/14/2014
[ 2536.250054] Workqueue: writeback bdi_writeback_workfn (flush-202:0)
[ 2536.250054] task: ffff880766533400 ti: ffff88076652e000 task.ti: ffff88076652e000
[ 2536.250054] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810cc518>] [<ffffffff810cc518>] smp_call_function_many+0x258/0x2b0
[ 2536.250054] RSP: 0018:ffff88076652f878 EFLAGS: 00000202
[ 2536.250054] RAX: 000000000000000f RBX: ffff88076652f808 RCX: ffff880ef0ef74a8
[ 2536.250054] RDX: 000000000000000f RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 0000000000000000
[ 2536.250054] RBP: ffff88076652f8c0 R08: ffff880771046c00 R09: ffff880770c008e0
[ 2536.250054] R10: 000000000000003e R11: 0000000000000210 R12: ffff88076652f7f0
[ 2536.250054] R13: ffffffff810b859e R14: ffff88076652f7e0 R15: ffffffff810b50e7
[ 2536.250054] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880771600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 2536.250054] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 2536.250054] CR2: 00007f8752bea000 CR3: 0000000001a0d000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[ 2536.250054] Stack:
[ 2536.250054] 0000000181275231 0000000000014d00 ffff88076652f8d0 ffffffff810564e0
[ 2536.250054] ffff88076530b180 00007f0c8826a000 ffff880ed4d57700 ffff88076530b180
[ 2536.250054] ffff880ed4cc6350 ffff88076652f8e8 ffffffff81056637 ffff88076530b180
[ 2536.250054] Call Trace:
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff810564e0>] ? leave_mm+0x70/0x70
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81056637>] native_flush_tlb_others+0x37/0x40
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81056988>] flush_tlb_page+0x88/0x90
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8117bb94>] ptep_clear_flush+0x34/0x40
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81175b1e>] page_mkclean+0x12e/0x1d0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8114aeeb>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x3b/0xe0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffffa016fd52>] mpage_submit_page+0x52/0x80 [ext4]
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffffa016fe89>] mpage_process_page_bufs+0x109/0x140 [ext4]
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffffa01700d7>] mpage_prepare_extent_to_map+0x217/0x2d0 [ext4]
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffffa0174929>] ext4_writepages+0x469/0xca0 [ext4]
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8114cd3e>] do_writepages+0x1e/0x50
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff811d7716>] __writeback_single_inode+0x76/0x240
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff811d7c12>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x282/0x420
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff811d7e2f>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x7f/0xd0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff811d884b>] wb_writeback+0x15b/0x2a0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff811d8fa7>] bdi_writeback_workfn+0x1d7/0x450
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8107be4d>] process_one_work+0x25d/0x460
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8107d196>] worker_thread+0x266/0x480
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff8107cf30>] ? manage_workers.isra.18+0x3f0/0x3f0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81083bcb>] kthread+0xbb/0xd0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81083b10>] ? kthread_stop+0xf0/0xf0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff814d4dbc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 2536.250054] [<ffffffff81083b10>] ? kthread_stop+0xf0/0xf0
[ 2536.250054] Code: 00 74 70 48 63 35 d1 1f a1 00 ba ff ff ff ff eb 29 66 90 48 98 48 8b 0b 48 03 0c c5 00 27 ad 81 f6 41 20 01 74 14 0f 1f 44 00 00 <f3> 90 f6 41 20 01 75 f8 48 63 35 a1 1f a1 00 48 8b 7b 08 83 c2
[ 2544.900055] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#31 stuck for 24s! [systemd-journal:304]
[ 2544.900055] Modules linked in: isofs crct10dif_pclmul crct10dif_common crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd raid0 md_mod acpi_cpufreq psmouse i2c_piix4 intel_agp intel_gtt i2c_core processor serio_raw evdev microcode ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 ata_generic pata_acpi ata_piix libata scsi_mod floppy ixgbevf xen_privcmd xen_netfront xen_kbdfront syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops xen_blkfront virtio_pci virtio_net virtio_blk virtio_ring virtio ipmi_poweroff ipmi_msghandler button
[ 2544.900055] CPU: 31 PID: 304 Comm: systemd-journal Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc4-bisect-00073-g6fe6b2d #26
[ 2544.900055] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.2.amazon 01/14/2014
[ 2544.900055] task: ffff880764bcb400 ti: ffff8807653f6000 task.ti: ffff8807653f6000
[ 2544.900055] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810cc040>] [<ffffffff810cc040>] generic_exec_single+0x80/0xa0
[ 2544.900055] RSP: 0018:ffff8807653f7c80 EFLAGS: 00000202
[ 2544.900055] RAX: 0000000000000080 RBX: ffffffff813207fd RCX: 0000000000000080
[ 2544.900055] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000080
[ 2544.900055] RBP: ffff8807653f7cb0 R08: ffffffff8160d148 R09: ffff880770c006a8
[ 2544.900055] R10: 0000000000000020 R11: ffffea003b490700 R12: ffffffff810b859e
[ 2544.900055] R13: ffff8807653f7bf8 R14: ffffffff810b50e7 R15: ffff8807653f7be8
[ 2544.900055] FS: 00007f0c934cd780(0000) GS:ffff880ef0fe0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 2544.900055] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 2544.900055] CR2: 00007f0c934db000 CR3: 0000000764b0f000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[ 2544.900055] Stack:
[ 2544.900055] 0000000106038000 000000000000000f 000000000000001f ffffffff81adcfe0
[ 2544.900055] ffffffff810564e0 000000000000001f ffff8807653f7d20 ffffffff810cc195
[ 2544.900055] 00007f0c934db000 ffff8807653f7cd8 ffff880ef0ef74a8 ffff880ef0ef4d00
[ 2544.900055] Call Trace:
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810564e0>] ? leave_mm+0x70/0x70
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810cc195>] smp_call_function_single+0x135/0x170
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810564e0>] ? leave_mm+0x70/0x70
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810cc3c5>] smp_call_function_many+0x105/0x2b0
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810564e0>] ? leave_mm+0x70/0x70
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81056637>] native_flush_tlb_others+0x37/0x40
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff810568ae>] flush_tlb_mm_range+0x1fe/0x250
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81167917>] tlb_flush_mmu+0x37/0xa0
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81167994>] tlb_finish_mmu+0x14/0x50
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff8116fdc5>] unmap_region+0x105/0x120
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff811cd01e>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x3e/0x140
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81170349>] ? vma_rb_erase+0x1c9/0x210
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81171f10>] do_munmap+0x280/0x370
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81172041>] vm_munmap+0x41/0x60
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff81172f42>] SyS_munmap+0x22/0x30
[ 2544.900055] [<ffffffff814d4e6d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
[ 2544.900055] Code: 48 89 4b 08 48 89 19 e8 4f 05 40 00 4d 39 fc 8b 55 d4 75 0f 44 89 f7 ff 15 5e 8d 95 00 8b 55 d4 0f 1f 00 85 d2 75 06 eb 0a 66 90 <f3> 90 f6 43 20 01 75 f8 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f

At this point, the MD array will not accept any I/O, and any requests will just
result in additional soft lockup messages.

I originally noticed this issue on Linux 3.13.3, and wasn't able to reproduce
it on 3.10.30. I eventually narrowed it down to a regression introduced between
3.12 and 3.13. A bisection blames this commit:

commit b795854b1fa70f6aee923ae5df74ff7afeaddcaa
Author: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Mon Oct 7 11:29:07 2013 +0100

sched/numa: Set preferred NUMA node based on number of private faults

Ideally it would be possible to distinguish between NUMA hinting faults that
are private to a task and those that are shared. If treated identically
there is a risk that shared pages bounce between nodes depending on
the order they are referenced by tasks. Ultimately what is desirable is
that task private pages remain local to the task while shared pages are
interleaved between sharing tasks running on different nodes to give good
average performance. This is further complicated by THP as even
applications that partition their data may not be partitioning on a huge
page boundary.

To start with, this patch assumes that multi-threaded or multi-process
applications partition their data and that in general the private accesses
are more important for cpu->memory locality in the general case. Also,
no new infrastructure is required to treat private pages properly but
interleaving for shared pages requires additional infrastructure.

To detect private accesses the pid of the last accessing task is required
but the storage requirements are a high. This patch borrows heavily from
Ingo Molnar's patch "numa, mm, sched: Implement last-CPU+PID hash tracking"
to encode some bits from the last accessing task in the page flags as
well as the node information. Collisions will occur but it is better than
just depending on the node information. Node information is then used to
determine if a page needs to migrate. The PID information is used to detect
private/shared accesses. The preferred NUMA node is selected based on where
the maximum number of approximately private faults were measured. Shared
faults are not taken into consideration for a few reasons.

First, if there are many tasks sharing the page then they'll all move
towards the same node. The node will be compute overloaded and then
scheduled away later only to bounce back again. Alternatively the shared
tasks would just bounce around nodes because the fault information is
effectively noise. Either way accounting for shared faults the same as
private faults can result in lower performance overall.

The second reason is based on a hypothetical workload that has a small
number of very important, heavily accessed private pages but a large shared
array. The shared array would dominate the number of faults and be selected
as a preferred node even though it's the wrong decision.

The third reason is that multiple threads in a process will race each
other to fault the shared page making the fault information unreliable.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
[ Fix complication error when !NUMA_BALANCING. ]
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-30-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Here's the bisection log:

# bad: [d8ec26d7] Linux 3.13
# good: [5e01dc7b] Linux 3.12
# bad: [42a2d923] Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/gi
# bad: [4b4d2b46] Merge tag 'h8300-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.or
# skip: [c224b76b] Merge tag 'nfs-for-3.13-1' of git://git.linux-nfs.
# good: [ae1dd9bc] Staging: xillybus: quoted strings split across lin
# good: [beb5bfe4] Merge tag 'fixes-nc-for-linus' of git://git.kernel
# good: [f9efbce6] Merge tag 'dt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/p
# good: [ad5d6989] Merge branch 'perf-core-for-linus' of git://git.ke
# bad: [39cf275a] Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.k
# good: [e6628d5b] sched/numa: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node
# bad: [04bb2f94] sched/numa: Adjust scan rate in task_numa_placemen
# bad: [e1dda8a7] sched/numa: Fix placement of workloads spread acro
# bad: [58d081b5] sched/numa: Avoid overloading CPUs on a preferred
# good: [073b5bee] sched/numa: Remove check that skips small VMAs
# bad: [6fe6b2d6] sched/numa: Do not migrate memory immediately afte
# bad: [b795854b] sched/numa: Set preferred NUMA node based on numbe

Anyone have any ideas why this change broke things? Is there any additional
information I can provide to help pin this down?

- Steven


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-19 09:01    [W:0.065 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site