Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:42:39 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Use MAX_NICE to replace hard coding of 19. |
| |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:13:13AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:37:32AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > > > cc: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org> > > > > cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > > > > I get complaints about MAX_NICE being undefined, and I don't see any > > definition of MAX_NICE in sched.h as of 3.14-rc2. Am I looking in > > the wrong place, or is this symbol not yet quite in mainline? > > It is not.. its a proposed thingy. I'm still trying to make up my mind > on it.
OK, will hold off then.
Thanx, Paul
|  |