lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCHv7 0/3] Kernel Live Patching
From
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
>> >> Could you describe what this does to signing? I presume the patched
>> >> module should cause a taint on module signing?
>> >
>> > Hmm, why should it?
>>
>> I wanted to clarify it from a different perspective
>>
>> If the base image is signed by X and the patched module is signed by
>> Y, is that supported. What does it imply in the case of live-patching?
>
> Why should that matter? Both are signed by keys that kernel is configured
> to trust, which makes them equal (even though they are technically
> different).
>

I am not sure they are equal, others can comment

Balbir Singh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-17 09:21    [W:0.048 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site