Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:13:28 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCHv7 0/3] Kernel Live Patching | From | Balbir Singh <> |
| |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Could you describe what this does to signing? I presume the patched >> module should cause a taint on module signing? > > Hmm, why should it? >
I wanted to clarify it from a different perspective
If the base image is signed by X and the patched module is signed by Y, is that supported. What does it imply in the case of live-patching?
Balbir Singh
| |