Messages in this thread | | | Subject | arm: pxa: CPU_PXA27x? | From | Paul Bolle <> | Date | Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:43:47 +0100 |
| |
Robert,
Your commit 03ec7fe70c5c ("arm: pxa: add pxa27x device-tree support") is included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141121). It adds a select statement for CPU_PXA27x. But there's no Kconfig symbol CPU_PXA27x.
Why is that select needed? For what it's worth: __cpu_is_pxa27x() compiles to something interesting if CONFIG_PXA27x is defined.
In https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/30/578 I proposed a patch that emits a warning in cases like this. Like _all_ Kconfig related patches I've seen flying by lately it appears to be dropped in /dev/null. What's going on?
Paul Bolle
| |