lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] of/irq: Drop obsolete 'interrupts' vs 'interrupts-extended' text
From
Date
a9ecdc0fdc54 ("of/irq: Fix lookup to use 'interrupts-extended' property
first") updated the description to say that:

- Both 'interrupts' and 'interrupts-extended' may be present
- Software should prefer 'interrupts-extended'
- Software that doesn't comprehend 'interrupts-extended' may use
'interrupts'

But there is still a paragraph at the end that prohibits having both and
says 'interrupts' should be preferred.

Remove the contradictory text.

Fixes: a9ecdc0fdc54 ("of/irq: Fix lookup to use 'interrupts-extended' property first")
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.13+
---
.../bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
index ce6a1a072028..8a3c40829899 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
@@ -30,10 +30,6 @@ should only be used when a device has multiple interrupt parents.
Example:
interrupts-extended = <&intc1 5 1>, <&intc2 1 0>;

-A device node may contain either "interrupts" or "interrupts-extended", but not
-both. If both properties are present, then the operating system should log an
-error and use only the data in "interrupts".
-
2) Interrupt controller nodes
-----------------------------



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-02 00:41    [W:0.127 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site