lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] regulator: of: Lower the severity of the error with no container
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:25:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We'll do something, just a question of what and what the default is.

> Ok. Note that a boot parameter would not work well for our use case,
> so it would be great if we can find something else.

Could you explain why please?

> > Shove a dev_name() on the front if we get a collision? I have to say
> > I've never cared, the debugfs isn't that important so it doesn't matter
> > too much if it fails.

> Sure, but, again, I am getting lots and lots of those error messages.
> I probably would not care either (and probably not even have noticed)
> if not for those messages.

> Want me to submit a patch with the dev_name solution ?

Yes, please.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-09 18:22    [W:0.127 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site