Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Oct 2014 16:54:40 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: of: Lower the severity of the error with no container |
| |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:25:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:12:13AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > We'll do something, just a question of what and what the default is.
> Ok. Note that a boot parameter would not work well for our use case, > so it would be great if we can find something else.
Could you explain why please?
> > Shove a dev_name() on the front if we get a collision? I have to say > > I've never cared, the debugfs isn't that important so it doesn't matter > > too much if it fails.
> Sure, but, again, I am getting lots and lots of those error messages. > I probably would not care either (and probably not even have noticed) > if not for those messages.
> Want me to submit a patch with the dev_name solution ?
Yes, please. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |