lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] regulator: of: Lower the severity of the error with no container
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:05:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > definitely at least add a boot argument or something to suppress them,
> > let me have a think if we want to do that by default.

> It is a nuisance, so I might just disable it in our tree if we don't
> find some other solution.

We'll do something, just a question of what and what the default is.

> Did you notice the problem with debugfs I had mentioned earlier ?
> With all those regulators, not all of them being used, I end up with
> many having the same name. This causes issues with debugfs, which is
> trying to create the same file several times.

> Any idea how we could solve this ? The constraints message is annoying,
> but this one is a real issue.

Shove a dev_name() on the front if we get a collision? I have to say
I've never cared, the debugfs isn't that important so it doesn't matter
too much if it fails.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-09 02:41    [W:0.092 / U:1.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site