Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Jan 2014 23:12:21 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks |
| |
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Subject: lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:48 +0100 > > > > This patch extends lockdep to validate lock wait-type context. > > ooh, a new toy. > > *boom* >
Oh cute, I'll have to stare at slub. ISTR there's a current slub-rt patch floating about.
I'd have to just blindly convert slub to raw_spinlocks (although that'll get rid of the warning) without trying to limit the lock hold time of raw_spinlocks.
> nitpick: Why is the backtrace printed twice ?
Because I'm an idiot, lemme fix that ;-)
| |