lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Subject: lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:48 +0100
> >
> > This patch extends lockdep to validate lock wait-type context.
>
> ooh, a new toy.
>
> *boom*
>

Oh cute, I'll have to stare at slub. ISTR there's a current slub-rt
patch floating about.

I'd have to just blindly convert slub to raw_spinlocks (although that'll
get rid of the warning) without trying to limit the lock hold time of
raw_spinlocks.

> nitpick: Why is the backtrace printed twice ?

Because I'm an idiot, lemme fix that ;-)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-10 00:21    [W:0.160 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site