Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:40:41 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > But what I really can't understans is what "check == 0" means? It > > seems that in fact it can be 1 or 2? Or, iow, "check == 0" is > > actually equivalent to "check == 1" ? > > Hmm indeed, the comment in lockdep.h says 0 means no checks at all, > but the code doesn't actually appear to work like that. I'm not sure > it ever did or not, I'd have to go dig through history. > > That said, given the current state it certainly looks like we can > remove the check argument. > > Ingo?
Agreed.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |