[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.34.x longterm stable status
On 08/07/2013 09:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> - Shouldn't the EOL status be mentioned in the front page?
> It will be marked EOL at when it is EOL. Those that care
> about it being EOL would have seen the message about it becoming EOL in
> the previous 2.6.34.x release annoucement.

Maybe it is time to check in on this?

I just noticed that this is now over a year since the last 2.6.34
release, which lags the last 2.6.32 release by about five months. I am
asking because someone just queried me privately about the status of
2.6.34. I'm worrying if people think that security patches are still
being backported if in fact they aren't.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-21 17:01    [W:0.072 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site