Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:38:09 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.34.x longterm stable status |
| |
On 01/21/2014 07:58 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 14-01-21 10:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 08/07/2013 09:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> - Shouldn't the EOL status be mentioned in the www.kernel.org front page? >>> >>> It will be marked EOL at kernel.org when it is EOL. Those that care >>> about it being EOL would have seen the message about it becoming EOL in >>> the previous 2.6.34.x release annoucement. >>> >> >> Maybe it is time to check in on this? > > Yes, Konstantin just ping'd me recently on this, and the final update will > be out for review within a week; with a focus on just clear CVE like > fixes and hence a relatively smaller queue size (i.e. nothing like 200 > patches etc.) > > If you think it best to mark it EOL in advance of that last release, > rather than waiting for it to appear, I don't see that as a problem. >
No, if you are genuinely planning another release soon that's fine.
-hpa
| |