lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor()
From
On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered.
>
> There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config,
> periodic tick or tickless system.
>
> menu => tickless system
> periodic => periodic tick system
>
> IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes
> sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ?

I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-26 09:01    [W:0.151 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site