Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:07:41 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor() | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered. > > There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config, > periodic tick or tickless system. > > menu => tickless system > periodic => periodic tick system > > IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes > sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ?
I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)
| |