Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:20:11 +0200 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor() |
| |
On 09/26/2013 08:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered. >> >> There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config, >> periodic tick or tickless system. >> >> menu => tickless system >> periodic => periodic tick system >> >> IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes >> sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ? > > I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)
Rafael is pretty busy ATM but may be he can give his feedback on this later.
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |