lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor()
On 09/26/2013 08:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered.
>>
>> There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config,
>> periodic tick or tickless system.
>>
>> menu => tickless system
>> periodic => periodic tick system
>>
>> IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes
>> sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ?
>
> I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)

Rafael is pretty busy ATM but may be he can give his feedback on this later.


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-26 10:41    [W:0.058 / U:2.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site