lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 10:31 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:39:06PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>> On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>> I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on
>> linux-next, I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it) and will
>> send again.
> Yeah, this doesn't apply against Greg's usb-next tree, so I can't take
> it. If you're sending non-bug fixes in, you need to base your patches
> against that tree, or linux-next.
>
> Sarah Sharp
I'm trying against linux-git as
cat 0027-xHCI-Fixing-xhci_readl-definition-and-function-call.patch|
patch
and then after i enter the required file (drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c).
it's giving me message

File to patch: drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
patching file drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
can't find file to patch at input line 180
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:

but when i saw the file i found changes are applied there.

I had made the patch using git format-patch. what could be the possible
reason behind this issue or am i mistaking somewhere?


Regards
Kumar Gaurav





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-28 19:41    [W:0.068 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site