Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:45:48 +0530 | From | Kumar Gaurav <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call |
| |
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 10:31 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:39:06PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote: >> On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote: >> I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on >> linux-next, I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it) and will >> send again. > Yeah, this doesn't apply against Greg's usb-next tree, so I can't take > it. If you're sending non-bug fixes in, you need to base your patches > against that tree, or linux-next. > > Sarah Sharp I'm trying against linux-git as cat 0027-xHCI-Fixing-xhci_readl-definition-and-function-call.patch| patch and then after i enter the required file (drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c). it's giving me message
File to patch: drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c patching file drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c can't find file to patch at input line 180 Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was:
but when i saw the file i found changes are applied there.
I had made the patch using git format-patch. what could be the possible reason behind this issue or am i mistaking somewhere?
Regards Kumar Gaurav
| |