Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:39:06 +0530 | From | Kumar Gaurav <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call |
| |
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote: >> This patch redefine function xhci_readl.xhci_readl function doesn't use xhci_hcd argument. >> Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function arguments. >> >> Redefining this function breaks other functions which calls this function. >> This phatch also correct those calls in xhci driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@gmail.com> >> --- > Could you put a list of changes since v2 here?: > > v3: blah blah changelog mostly. > > Also this doesn't apply for me against linux-next. > > regards, > dan carpenter > There's no change from v2. I was sending the same patch again because the last one was lacking good description and i was told (or as i understood) that if I'm sending the same patch or patch for the same purpose as previous then i should increment version so i did.
I had developed this patch against linux-git, haven't tested that on linux-next as i haven't cloned linux-next yet.
I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on linux-next, I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it) and will send again.
Regards Kumar Gaurav
| |