lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel/padata.c: always check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu()
On 08/22/2013 01:11 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:44:31AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> If this patch is correct, better to let CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED
>> share the same code.
>>
>> And do we need a comment "/* fall through */" between CPU_UP_CANCELED
>> and CPU_DOWN_FAILED (or it is another bug, need a 'break' statement) ?
>>
>> At last, also better to let CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED share
>> the same code (if need a 'break'), or share the most of code (if "fall
>> through").
>>
>
> CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED can share the code. Same is true for
> CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED.
>
> Thanks!
>
>

Thank you too.

And need I send another patch for it ?

Or just make by yourself (and better to mark me as Reported-by). :-)


Thanks.
--
Chen Gang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-22 07:41    [W:0.055 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site